Single Cloud vs. Multi-Cloud: 7 Key Differences

gowebing

The advent of the Internet has brought revolutionary changes in the IT world. One of the notable changes is that virtualization has advanced with the Internet to become an integral part of the IT infrastructure of modern organizations. As a result, companies are now relying on the virtual online entity housing data and services, commonly referred to as the cloud. The switch to the cloud was brought on by the exponential data growth in the last couple of decades. In fact, studies predict that by 2025, the cloud will be storing up to 100 zettabytes of data.

What Is the Cloud?

The cloud refers to a global network of remote servers, each with a unique function that are connected and work together as a unitary ecosystem. In simple terms, the cloud describes what we commonly know as the “internet.” This remote network of servers is designed to either store and manage data, run applications, or deliver content or a service such as streaming videos or accessing social media networks for anyone with an internet connection. 

What Is Cloud Computing?

It is the provision of computing resources such as servers, storage, databases, networking, software, analytics, and intelligence over the cloud (internet). Cloud computing eliminates the need for enterprises to acquire, configure, or manage resources themselves, and instead, only pay for what they use.

Virtual computers gained popularity in the 1990s when the IT industry started to rent virtual private networks. Their use sped up the development of the cloud computing infrastructure that organizations use today. 

Cloud computing offers a variety of benefits for businesses with some of the key ones being:  

With that being said, there are three main types of cloud computing deployments: 

Single and multi-cloud concepts come from employing these deployment types from either one or numerous vendors. 

What Is a Single Cloud?

Single cloud is a cloud computing model where organizations rely on a single third-party vendor for their cloud computing services. The provider maintains on-premise servers to provide either of the following cloud services in the single-cloud environment:

Single Cloud Use Cases

The single cloud strategy is suitable for companies with the following use cases:

Single Cloud Strategy Advantages 

Single Cloud Strategy Disadvantages 

What Is Multi-Cloud?

Multi-cloud describes a cloud computing model where organizations use multiple cloud providers for their infrastructure requirements. The name multi-cloud refers to the use of multiple cloud providers, accounts, availability zones, premises, or a combination of them.

Multi-Cloud Strategy

Multi-Cloud Use Cases

The multi-cloud strategy is suitable for companies with the following use cases:

Multi-Cloud Strategy Advantages 

Organizations consider a multi-cloud environment for the following benefits:

Multi-Cloud Strategy Disadvantages 

The multi-cloud model comes with the following disadvantages:

Single Cloud vs. Multi-Cloud: The Key Differences

This table gives you a side-by-side comparison of the single cloud vs multi-cloud strategies:

Differences Single Cloud Multi-Cloud
Vendors Single vendor dependency Multiple vendors offering more control
Cost Payment to one provider Payment to multiple providers
Purpose Provides single service Handles multiple services with multiple solutions
Required Skillset Fewer cloud engineers
required to manage the cloud		 Require extensive cloud engineering teams
with strong multi-cloud expertise
Security Easier to ensure data compliance Less secure with distributed sensitive data
Disaster Recovery Single point of failure making it vulnerable to disasters Easier disaster recovery
Management Easier management Complex management

The Cloud Portability Myth Under the Multi-Cloud Model and Potential Workarounds 

Migrating cloud services in a multi-cloud environment is always vulnerable to disruption. Cloud portability potentially reduces this vulnerability by facilitating the transfer of services between cloud environments with minimal disruption.

While cloud portability may seem practical, some underlying complexities render this concept mythical. Essentially, cloud environments are migrated in compiled containers that make an entire cloud environment portable. However, while the containers may be portable, other public clouds cannot execute them without the underlying cloud-native services. Consequently, migrating this way defeats the purpose of employing a multi-cloud strategy.

Achieving cloud portability may be complex, but companies still opt for the multi-cloud strategy to keep up with their competitors. The key is to find out how to work around this myth to run your multi-cloud models successfully. A trial-and-error approach would be to make multiple copies of compiled containers for each cloud environment. The container copy that offers the correct solution passes for deployment in other cloud platforms. 

Alternatively, you can use a Platform-as-a-Service option to provide portable services that are not dependent on specific cloud platforms. This aspect makes migrating such an application platform achievable for organizations.

Single Cloud vs. Multi-Cloud Strategy: Which Is Better?

When it comes to single cloud vs. multi-cloud strategies, businesses are increasingly adopting the multi-cloud model. This strategy is favored as it allows you to work globally with data and applications spread across various cloud servers and data centers. However, such a model only suits large organizations because setting up and maintaining a multi-cloud environment is a costly and complex task. Additionally, they require excessive resources and robust strategies to optimize cloud migration. 

It is important to note that despite the use of optimized strategies, cloud portability still remains a myth for multi-cloud organizations. Primarily, at some point, your cloud portability workarounds are bound to become too complex to manage. These complexities include:

Are all these complexities worth investing in a multi-cloud strategy? The answer depends on your company’s use cases. However, another key consideration, in this case, is focusing on choosing the "right vendor"  on top of debating the single cloud vs. multi-cloud strategies, as it is vital to finding the best solution for your business.

Conclusion

Depending on your use case, being locked to a single vendor does more good to an organization than delving into multi-vendor complexities. The opposite is also true. To sum it up, instead of working around a myth, cloud optionality gives you a better chance to adopt a successful cloud strategy. While it may prolong the vendor selection process, if either a single cloud or a multi-cloud strategy is right for your business, you can save your company from costly cloud expenses.

 

 

 

 

Top